Circling in on Christ

For Holy Week, I’ve been reading Justin Lewis-Anthony’s book Circles of Thorns: Hieronymus Bosch and Being Human.

This book is an extended reflection on Bosch’s painting Christ Mocked (The Crowning with Thorns). I’d seen the painting before (possible even the real thing in the National Gallery), but it had never made much of an impact on me. It’s not a picture I’d particularly want over the mantelpiece, for example!

For Lewis-Anthony, however, the painting is a profound expression of the gospel – of the person of Christ, of his crucifixion and resurrection, and of the Christian life. Indeed, he credits the painting with having played a significant role in helping him recover from depression after he suffered a nervous breakdown in 2006.

In his book, Lewis-Anthony describes the five “circles” that he believes Bosch has depicted in Christ Mocked – multiple layers of meaning that we can only grasp if we enter into the political, scientific, psychological and devotional framework within which Bosch was working. In very brief summary, these are as follows:

Circle One: Politics

The first three circles have to do with the four figures surrounding Christ. First, Lewis-Anthony argues that the four figures represent four different political forces active in Bosch’s time. Going clockwise from top left:

  • The soldier in green represents the Hapsburg family, whose political power was then in the ascendant.
  • The figure in black represents the politicised and militarised Church, and in particular the power of the della Rovere family, whose emblem was the oak leaf and who produced two popes in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, including Pope Julius II.
  • The figure in pink at bottom right is rather more troubling, representing Jewish people (with a visual allusion to the host desecration libel) – a disturbing reminder of Europe’s history of anti-semitism.
  • The figure at bottom left represents “the Turk” (note the crescent moon on his headdress).

The key point, though, is not the identification of each figure, but the overall message that complicity in the execution of Jesus is shared by the whole of human political life: earthly rulers, the church (i.e. religious rulers), external enemies, and even (as we might now add) those whose “enmity” is just a projection of our own violent imaginations.

Circle Two: Elements

Lewis-Anthony sees the next layer of meaning as Bosch’s incorporation of the scientific understanding of his day – that of the four elements of earth, air, fire and water, and associated astrological symbolism. So the four figures this time are:

  • Top left: Fire / Aries / Mars – the sign of the soldier.
  • Top right: Air / Aquarius / Jupiter (whose sign was the oak) – the sign of the thinker, “but perhaps a cold and calculating one”.
  • Bottom right: Earth / Capricorn / Saturn – the sign of the merchant.
  • Bottom left: Water / Cancer / the moon – the sign of the unstable person (“lunatic”).

So the message here is that the whole of creation has turned on its Creator.

Circle Three: Temperaments

Closely related to the “elemental” understanding of the world was the “four humours” understanding of human psychology. Again, this is reflected in Bosch’s painting:

  • Top left: Choleric (associated with yellow bile and the spleen)
  • Top right: Sanguine (associated with blood and the liver)
  • Bottom right: Melancholic (associated with black bile and the gall bladder)
  • Bottom left: Phlegmatic (associated with phlegm and the brain/lungs).

Once again, the message is that it is not only some particular types of people who are complicit in Christ’s death: we are all of us, of whatever personality type we may be, responsible.

Circle Four: Devotion

The fourth circle, Lewis-Anthony argues, is in the horizontal plane, between Christ and the viewer. To be honest, I found that a bit of a stretch – but, setting that aside, Lewis-Anthony makes a persuasive case for the influence on Bosch of the “new devotion” associated with figures such as Thomas a Kempis.

For the New Devotion, “Christ was a goal, not the means to the goal”. The emphasis was not on imitating Christ in performing works of mercy, nor on “mystic union” with him:

…but rather on an individual and affective identification with particular moments in Christ’s life, chiefly his passion.

That emphasis on “individual and affective identification” is found in the eye-contact (which I find both comforting and unsettling) between Christ and the viewer.

Circle Five: Quiddity

This final circle concerns solely the figure of Christ himself. What does Bosch’s painting tell us of his “quiddity” – that is, his “real nature or essence”, “the very thing that makes him the person he is”?

Some of the answers to that question do not have a great deal of meaning for us today. We are unlikely to be greatly engaged by an exposition of Christ as “Master of the four balanced temperaments” or as the “representative quintessence of the created elements”.

However, Lewis-Anthony argues that the painting does have at least two answers to the question of Jesus’ “quiddity” that do still speak to us today. I hope to look at the first of these (at least) in my next post.

Credit: photo of Christ Mocked by Jonathan Aquino, licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Culture, Theology and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Circling in on Christ

  1. This is great! However, I’m confused about how the four figures correspond to the temperaments?

  2. John H says:

    Hmm, maybe my appetite for précising Lewis-Anthony was waning by that point – has ended up being a little oblique!

    From memory: the green soldier represents the choleric personality (see his clenched jaw); the black-clad soldier/bishop is the sanguine temperament (slightly detached and dreamy); the figure at bottom right is melancholic (just look at him!); while the old man at bottom left is phlegmatic (watery in appearance, and dead/dull in spirit).

    The figures also form a cross, with those of aggressive temperament (pushing or pulling on Christ) forming the top left to bottom right diagonal, and those of “falsely sympathetic” temperament from bottom left to top right.

  3. That makes sense. At first I looked for color and couldn’t find a correspondance.

  4. Pingback: Confessing Evangelical » “Who do you say that I am?” (1): Space

  5. Pingback: Confessing Evangelical » “Who do you say that I am?” (2): Time

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s