Rage against the Cowell

So, it happened: Rage Against The Machine’s “Killing In The Name” is the UK’s Christmas number one, having beaten this year’s X-Factor winner Joe McElderry by just under 52,000 sales.

There’s no shortage of wiseacres lining up to point out that (a) RATM are signed to Sony BMG (the same label as McElderry), so that “the only winner is The Man”, and (b) we’re still living under capitalism. But, while we need to keep a sense of perspective about this, overall I think this has been a Good Thing.

Despite what some have suggested, this was a genuinely spontaneous, grassroots campaign, not something “orchestrated” by the music industry. The campaign was started by Tracy and Jon Morter, a pair of music fans living in Essex, who did not for a moment expect the campaign to achieve the scale or success it did.

Here are some reasons why I’m happy this morning:

  • It’s a victory for those who campaigned for DRM-free music. The reason why RATM could go from the back catalogue to number 1 inside a week is because of the wide availability of legal, unrestricted MP3 music downloads. A couple of years ago people would have had a choice of (a) iTunes; or (b) illegal sources (which obviously don’t count towards the charts).
  • My inner “armchair anarchist” has enjoyed this reminder of what can be achieved through spontaneous, undirected self-organisation. People have, in a small way, shaken off their appointed role as passive consumers of what the media and entertainment industries direct towards them. Yes, this is a very small thing – and yes, it still involved the purchase of a music download from a multinational corporation – but we’re told not to despise the day of small things. Hopefully a few people will learn lessons here about what can be achieved in relation to more serious issues – and the fact we don’t need to wait for permission (or a large wadge of cash) to do something different.
  • The wiseacres are making a mistake when they try to “follow the money” here. Yes, RATM are signed to Sony BMG, but that’s (a) coincidental (I don’t think the Morters were aware of this when they started their campaign) and (b) an unavoidable consequence of music industry consolidation. And yes, Simon Cowell may gain some marginal financial benefit from RATM’s sales. But this isn’t about the money for Cowell: it’s about power; the power derived from both the reality and (equally important) the perception of his dominating the mainstream pop market. In a week where Cowell has been flexing his muscles in the political arena (and receiving grovelling political endorsements in return) it’s a good thing (even if, again, only a small one) for him to lose his aura of invincibility. It’s pretty safe to say that Cowell is not shrugging his shoulders today and saying, “Hey, it’s all money in the bank!”
  • It was also great fun. Really, that’s the most important reason.

There are also some reasons for caution, though.

  • As Zizek points out, capitalism has a remarkable ability to appropriate challenges to it. It’s safe to say the advertising industry will be looking at ways to exploit the success of this campaign, by instigating supposedly “grassroots” campaigns of their own. (This “cyber-astroturfing” has already been a success for Cadbury on a number of occasions, most notably the Facebook “campaign” to bring back Wispa.) And while Tracy Morter has said she and her husband are not interested in repeating the experience of the past week next Christmas, I think the Morters can expect a succession of enquiries from music industry PRs next autumn.
  • The campaign, despite its success, also highlights the weaknesses of online campaigning. By yesterday evening, 957,000 people had joined the campaign’s Facebook group. If each of those had followed through by purchasing the song (which they could have done for less than 50p) then the result would not even have been close. The song achieved 502,000 downloads, but by the time you take out multiple purchases (I bought three copies!) and those buying without joining the Facebook group, then it’s clear that substantially less than half of the group members actually followed through and bought the song.

    One way in which campaigns can succeed is by making use of the human desire not to behave inconsistently with one’s prior commitments. You sign a petition against Nestlé, say, and as a result you feel compelled to avoid Nestlé products in order to be consistent with the commitment you’ve made. The RATM campaign may be a valuable case study in how clicking “join this group” is not enough of a psychological commitment to make people feel compelled to behave consistently with it, even where the action required is so undemanding. Something to bear in mind next time one of those “million people standing strong against [your cause here]” groups is doing the rounds.

  • It was only the Christmas No. 1 for pity’s sake. Sheesh! Anyone would think it was the October Revolution or something! 😉

Finally: don’t feel too sad for Joe McElderry. The consensus is he’ll get his number one next week…

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Culture and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Rage against the Cowell

  1. Phil Walker says:

    I have adopted a personal policy not to join Facebook groups unless I had a prior commitment (political, practical, whatever’s appropriate) to the cause expressed.

  2. Brenny says:

    It was Tracy & Jon Morter not Wendy 😉
    Brenny xoxoxo

  3. John H says:

    Brenny: Eeeeek! How embarrassing. Monday morning typing at its finest. Corrected!

    (In my defence, I got her name right further down the post!)

    Phil: Indeed. To which end I should point out that (a) I’ve owned a copy of “Killing In The Name” ever since it first came out, and (b) my dislike of Simon Cowell and all his works certainly pre-dates last week. 😉

  4. Brenny says:

    No probs John. It did link to the correct Twitter to so not all bad! I shall direct Tracy & Jon to the blog 🙂
    Brenny xoxoxox

  5. JS Bangs says:

    I would be more impressed by this if Rage Against the Machine was something other than lowest-common-denominator lefty wank-rock.

  6. John H says:

    JS: Agreed that RATM aren’t exactly Woody Guthrie. But I don’t think the song was chosen for its profound, nuanced political message; just because it was the least appropriate Christmas No.1 that the organisers could think of.

  7. fat prophet says:

    I have no interest in X factor or Simon Cowell both bore me to tears but I have to say I have been a great fan of Christmas Number ones since the late 50’s and have really felt that Cowell and his cronies had hijacked Christmas by always finishing X factor just before and hence almost ensuring the Number 1 spot.
    I noticed that Simon Cowell was complaining last week about the campaign against his media circus and yet it is reported today he has offered the couple who started the campaign a job. I say well done to both of them for roving the Simon Cowell is not quite the god some people have made him out to be.
    Hopefully all of this will lead to a better chance of us getting a real race for number 1 in future years rather than the almost one horse race of the last three years.
    The unfortunate thing as you have indicated in your post is that Simon and the other music moguls are just as likely to try to use it to their advantage.

  8. Kirsty says:

    Think the song was chosen specifically for “that” line 🙂 And I agree – it was a lot of fun, which is how the Christmas number 1 used to be.

  9. My inner “armchair anarchist” has enjoyed this reminder of what can be achieved through spontaneous, undirected self-organisation.

    You’re riding so high on this cloud that I just can’t bear to tell you what economic system is based on “spontaneous, undirected self-organisation” is. Hint: It isn’t the one RatM advocates.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s